'Bad Losses' has always been one metric the selection committee uses to complete the bracket. I also think it's a really interesting way of looking at a team's season: have they won the games they were supposed to? Did they drop any unnecessary challenges? Uconn, playing with house money, hasn't dropped a single 'bad game.' Sure, they lost games they could have (and should have) won, but none of those were to bad teams. A friend and I were discussing how useful the 'bad loss' criteria is, and the following is the result of that discussion. It is the top 25 (by collegerpi.com), re-ordered according to the average RPI of a team's losses. I thought people on here might find it interesting.
| Ohio State | 0 | |
| San Diego St | 1 | |
| Utah St. | 3 | |
| Kansas | 7 | |
| Connecticut | 14.75 | |
| Pittsburgh | 15 | |
| Georgetown | 17.4 | |
| Purdue | 28.4 | |
| Notre Dame | 29 | |
| Texas | 33.33333333 | |
| Villanova | 34 | |
| Kentucky | 38.16666667 | |
| Duke | 38.5 | |
| Wisconsin | 38.6 | |
| West Virginia | 41.42857143 | |
| Syracuse | 44 | |
| Vanderbilt | 49 | |
| BYU | 50.5 | |
| North Carolina | 50.8 | |
| St. Johns | 58.33333333 | |
| George Mason | 65.6 | |
| Arizona | 67.75 | |
| Xavier | 73.16666667 | |
| Tennessee | 82.25 | |
| Florida | 90.8 |
I agree that Uconn should closed out a few games better, and that Calhoun has difficulty with any type of zone D. Nonetheless, I think this is a relatively good sign. Of teams with more than 1 loss, it's Utah St. and Uconn as #1 and #2. Take from that what you will.


There are 4 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.