UConn's deplorable exploitation of Jasper Howard's death
On Thursday a UConn task force proposed a series of steps to finally regain control of Spring Weekend. For the unfamiliar, Spring Weekend is a raucous party that occurs every April on the Storrs campus. It always features scores of arrests, there is usually some significant property damage involved, and last year Jafar Karzoun, a UConn student, died after a fight during the weekend.
Spring Weekend is a huge problem and an annual black eye for the school, so after years of pretending to try and get it under control, UConn seems committed to actually doing something about the madness. Unfortunately, their plan - canceling all the non-drinking events (oozeball, the annual concert, etc.) and asking students not to go to the unsanctioned parties - seems terribly misguided. But that's not a topic I want write about now (look for it later in the week), because while UConn's terrible attempts to manage Spring Weekend have always annoyed me, they do not come close to upsetting me as much as this line from an AP report on the plan:
[The task force] also asked students to participate in a voluntary moratorium on off-campus Spring Weekend parties out of respect for the deaths of Karzoun and football player Jasper Howard, who was stabbed on campus in October 2009.
I was furious when I first saw that and I've only gotten angrier as I have thought about it. UConn has, until now, done a phenomenal job of handling every aspect of Jasper Howard's murder. Randy Edsall, whatever you might think of him now, was there for his team, said all the right things and never, ever used Howard's death in an inappropriate manner. The handling of Howard's death was one of the rare things the school does that was absolutely pitch perfect from start to finish.
But not this. This is pure, naked exploitation.
To review: Jasper Howard's death was a tragedy. It was a senseless murder that occurred six months before Spring Weekend. He was stabbed outside the Student Union on a Saturday night. He was there attending a school-sanctioned dance, and was killed by a cheap thug who snuck off to his car to get a knife because of a disagreement over a girl.
Howard's death had nothing to do with Spring Weekend. He wasn't in X-Lot, or at Carriage, or at Celeron. It did not happen because a party got out of control and it did not happen because police were overwhelmed by thousands of revelers. It happened because a coward thought the answer to an argument at a dance was to go and get a knife.
If you ask students on campus, they'll tell you that if you want to have something to do in Storrs on a Friday or Saturday that does not involve drinking your one and only option is to go to the Student Union. Howard wasn't at the type of wild party the school is asking students to abstain from in his name. He was at the type of appropriate and reasonable alternative to that party that the school has inexplicably cancelled for this year's Spring Weekend.
UConn may want students to stop partying, but it is not because of Howard's death. If that was the case they would have tried to cancel Spring Weekend in his name last year. The school is using Howard's name because it is a big name, and I suspect they think that by making a cheap appeal to the sentiment that brought the campus together in the Fall of 2009 they might be able to keep some egg off of their face in the Spring of 2011.
The worst part about all of this is that a student did die at Spring Weekend last year in a tragedy that was equally senseless. Jafar Karzoun was a member of the UConn community. He was a friend and a classmate to people in Storrs, but he didn't play for the football team so apparently UConn thought his name wasn't important enough to stand alone. That is disgraceful and the school should be ashamed.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank you
I was thinking of this when the story first came out, and I’m glad you picked up on it.
The UConn handling of Spring Weekend has sucked for years, and this is the peak of suckiness. Their strategy of canceling all school-related activities to curb non-school-related activities is beyond stupid. You’ll never take the drinking culture away from the event, but you can ease the school related stuff back in and make it an important part of the weekend. A part that the students actually want to be a part of.
My solution has always been this: On Spring Weekend, close campus to non-students. To get anywhere near campus, you need to be a student with a student ID. If you want to bring a guest, he has to be vouched for by a student, so that if something happens that said non-student does something stupid, illegal or both, their student host is responsible and punishable. A high-percentage of problems on Spring Weekend are caused by people who don’t even go to UConn.
the idea of keeping non-students off campus is fine
the problem then becomes how do you keep students that live off campus from bringing their guests? And no one has or is going to address that. The town really has to step up and tell the cops and apartment buildings that they will not allow them to host these huge parties. And the cops need to enforce the rules on everyone not just non-UConn students.
Also you’d then have a civil liberties issue with denying the public access to a public university. It sounds easy to deny people access but the fact is, anyone is allowed on campus at any time. You can’t deny them general access on the suspicion they may do wrong. They can prevent students from having guests stay in the rooms but not from actually coming to campus.
And who is going to enforce the no guests on campus rule. I was an RA/CA for three years. I remember"registering" guests for access to the dorms, trying to keep it to two guests a person. Didn’t work. There is no possible way we got a quarter of them and that didn’t stop people from bringing back randoms they met out at a party. Are the RAs now going to go room to room and kick out anyone without a student ID? I know I wouldn’t have been comfortable doing that.
per the civil liberties issue
our resident law student may have to blow-up my assumptions there. I totally BS’d them. But it sounds true!
Good points
Didn’t say it was easy. But solutions to this aren’t going to be easy, especially considering the brain trust that is working on this.
I always hate to do those “back in the day” deals, but “back in the day”, the concert was the single most important part of the weekend. And it wasn’t just one or two acts. It was a festival, pretty much, outdoors at Memorial Stadium, starting ’round noonish and going ’til dark. And it had music for all tastes: Hip-hop, alt, blues, etc. Oozeball was also a big deal as well, though it started too early in the day for a drunk like me.
I may be oversimplifying things by saying this, but the non-students are the problem, pretty much. Find a way to exclude them from the festivities somehow, preferably legally, and you’ll see the problems ease somewhat. And Eastern students must be banned from leaving Willimantic. Period.
The noon through dark hours aren't
the problem. Over my last teo years at UConn there was plenty to do during the days. oozeball and Southapalooza, baseball games and some other things (not to mention the NFL draft generally fell on Spring Weekend). And those were generally well attended, controlled and fun. Not just for UConn students but for guests as well. The problems started at night when there wasn’t a good alternative to walking a mile off campus to stnad around. Now it sounds like the powers that be want to ban those activities, thinking that will prevent further things from happening. I can’t do anything but shake my head at that logic.
Yeah no offense
But it shows that you BSed them. You don’t have some magic right to be at UConn just because it’s a public university. A courthouse is a public building, but try walking to places you aren’t supposed to go and see how quickly security stops you.
by James Ringold on Jan 24, 2011 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
Totally agree
And thanks for touching on this. My friends and I couldn’t believe how Jasper Howard’s death was mentioned in an address about Spring Weekend.
One thing that I never understood in UConn’s attmept to decrease the number of students at X-Lot was moving the concert to a different night. Their reasoning was that by moving the concert a week before Spring Weekend, the amount of people at X-Lot would drastically change. I don’t think that they realized that the Spring Concert was actually keeping people from going to X-Lot because the crowds were forced to disperse before the concert was ever over. With that alone I knew that UConn didn’t really have any idea how to handle the masses at Spring Weekend.
@fcmonk I completely agree with your solution. The use of a UConn ID during Spring Weekend would solve a lot of the problems, seeing as how the majority of arrests and idiots that cause trouble are from off campus.
"The worst thing you can do, at least this is what my friends tell me, is to come after me," Calhoun said. "I'm usually better at coming out of the corner than I am up on the pedestal. I haven't been on many pedestals, by the way. I'm a natural underdog, I guess -- sometimes for no apparent reason. And if I can't be the underdog, I'll make myself the underdog, somehow or other."
Lulz
Don’t get me wrong, I agree this was a misuse of Howard’s death but…
“Randy Edsall, whatever you might think of him now, was there for his team, said all the right things and never, ever used Howard’s death in an inappropriate manner.”
Really? Still obsessing over the death of the player the NEXT season? Making that into the narrative of the team for a YEAR AND A HALF? That’s not inappropriate?
I wasn't bothered by it
I thought Edsall’s/the team’s tributes to Howard steered closer to “honor” than “exploitation.” I could be wrong, though.
UConn: Where we proudlyish carry on the dual traditions of great women's basketball teams and awful school commercials.
by Kevin Meacham on Jan 24, 2011 9:03 PM EST up reply actions
So mourning someone close to you simply ends when the season ends? Edsall wasn’t some dick that didn’t care to get to know his players, you know? And it wasn’t really just him that was making it “into the narrative of the team for a year and a half” but also the team itself. Because that’s what you do when you loose a teammate right? You spend some time mourning his loss, and celebrating the years he did live.
by Ryan Wilson on Jan 25, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
You got this spot on
I hope that a better solution is found, because I just can’t see this ending well if the administration insists on ignoring what the students really feel…but the students need to appropriately let the school know their feelings too.
UCONN used Jasper Howard’s name as a way of trying to remind UCONN students that it isn’t just Spring Weekend that has gotten out of hand but the University’s entire attitude and take on partying that has gotten ridiculous. I think that tossing Carlee Wines’ name in there would be reasonable too. All of these people died as a result of irresponsible attitudes possessed by UCONN partygoers- and before anyone points out the presence of non-UCONN students in these situations, remember that if someone who does not go to UCONN is at a UCONN-related party, it is almost always because they were brought there or invited there by a UCONN student.
by Nicholas Tuzzio on Jan 25, 2011 12:49 PM EST reply actions

by 










