My quick reaction after reading the NCAA's allegations against UConn
I just finished reading through the 23-page notice of allegations that the NCAA has given to UConn. A lot of the detail is blacked out, but from what we already know, the majority of it seems to deal with the recruitment of former Husky Nate Miles and former UConn manager and agent Josh Nochimson.
First off, I’m not an expert on these matters beyond watching what happens when the NCAA hauls in other schools for breaking the rules, but my initial reaction is that I’m not incredibly worried (Meacham on the other hand, seems much more concerned, so I’m sure he’ll be along).
Most of what I can tell from the report (again, much of it is redacted) is stuff we already knew. The UConn staff, especially Beau Archibald and Patrick Sellers, were making way too many impermissible phone calls (114 impermissible phone calls & 181 texts (to [BLANKED OUT NAME] for Archibald and 19 calls from Sellers to four different players).
In addition, Josh Nochimson just seems like all around bad news, and the recruitment of Nate Miles seems to be just as big of a mess as everyone has reported.
The two coaches accused of misleading the NCAA are Archibald and Sellers. Sellers looks like he might have just gotten mixed up at one point, denying he saw Nochimson’s name on a redacted something or other in Jan. 2009, but then saying he did see it during a follow-up interview in October. Archibald, on the other hand, does not look quite as good. The NCAA is alleging he denied knowing Ron Shade, an associate of Nochimson’s, despite placing 16 phone calls to and two text messages to him (including one on Christmas Day) long before his interview.
Calhoun is named for two reasons. First, the report says he apparently knew that Archibald was making improper phone calls to a recruit (name redacted) and did not stop it. Second, the NCAA is alleging that he was not doing enough to monitor the relationship between Nochimson and the program, despite knowing that there might be issues.
UConn is also accused of improperly giving out 26 free tickets to high school basketball coaches in 2007 and 2008.
My instant reaction to all of this is that while none of it is good, and the Nochimson stuff is particularily bad, UConn should probably be ok. They’ll certainly receive some penalty from the NCAA, but since Miles never suited up for the Huskies, it will probably be mild. The one x-factor is if one of the redacted names if Ater Majok. Majok, who reportedly had some contact with Nochimson during his recruitment, has suited up for the Huskies, so who knows what the NCAA might do with that. However, Calhoun's statement said the NCAA investigation was focused on a "particular" athlete, who one would have to assume is Miles, so UConn might be in the clear on Majok.
UPDATE: After reading some reaction to this, I feel I should be more clear. I certainly did not use precise enough language when I said the penalty should be "mild." I full expect UConn to be hit with some form of recruiting restrictions, and possibly even the loss of a scholarship or two (which seems to be the general consensus in the press). However, I do not think this is going to mean any sort of postseason penalties for UConn, which is what I was really worried about.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My main concerns are in the other thread
I will say this – most of these violations seem minor, and/or they’ve been somewhat taken care of by the “resignations” of Sellers and Archibald. That covers the phone calls, the “inconsistencies” in the interviews, and the tickets.
The Nochimson thing is bad (not in the least because the staff had been informed in 1999 that Nochimson was becoming an agent), with the potential to get much worse.
Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.
I will fight the entire
NCAA.
Fold the football program, and deposit monies previously budgeted for said program into a savings account in Coach Calbertus Magnus's name.
Well
sometimes when you try and help a kid turn his life around these things happen. To think, if Coach Cal had gotten to him sooner and explained the concept of a restraining order we could be in a world of hurt. I guess Cal can’t save everyone, but I got no problem with him trying. On the bright side, paying for surgery is better than paying for hookers.
I sure hope we don’t lose that final four banner.
This is not minor. The report itself says each one of these 8 violations are considered major violations currently, but that they could be downgraded depending on Uconn’s response letter.
second you seem to have missed the part where Archibald gave improper benefits to a player, presumably miles. A lot’s redacted, but if you read the report it appears that archibald may have registered for and paid for miles presumably to take an exam for him to be eligible so presumably the SAT or the ACT.
I will fist-fight you
along with the entire NCAA.
Fold the football program, and deposit monies previously budgeted for said program into a savings account in Coach Calbertus Magnus's name.
Well
It ain’t good.
Archbald sounds like the douchebag in all of this, but let’s not give Coach Cal a pass. When you’re the boss, you have to know what’s going on around you, and he’s either clueless by not knowing what was going on or irresponsible for knowing what was going on, realizing the consequences, and putting his foot down. Ignorance is not an excuse.
I wonder how much our previous “good behavior” will help us out come punishment time.
hrrrmmm
I might be inclined to give coach cal somewhat of pass. These guys’ livelihoods depend upon their ability to recruit. And I imagine they will go to great lengths to get it. If Cal was like “Make sure Josh pays for the surgery” then yea, he’s responsible. But if Beau comes in and says “Coach, I’m making good progress with Nate Miles,” and Beau knew he was overstepping the boundaries to get there, I can’t see Cal saying, “Good to hear, let me see your phone bill” or Beau saying “And I’m using illegal recruiting practices to make it happen.” What I’m trying to say is, there is plenty of a way for an assistant to independently break the rules without a coach knowing, and that for the coach to find out would require a level of distrust that would be offensive. The big thing is this whole “Failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance.” I wonder how much effort it would take to prove you promoted compliance yet there were violations anyway. I don’t think Cal would intentionally look the other way, but I don’t think he would go out of his way to ensure standards were being met. My point is, it’s tough to be a college basketball coach.

by 









