Notice of allegations: Jim Calhoun failed to 'promote an atmosphere of compliance'
This morning, UConn published the details of the NCAA's notice of allegations against the basketball program on its website. The allegations, which are related to the recruitment of former Husky Nate Miles, come after 15 months of NCAA investigations and the resignation of two UConn assistants yesterday. UConn has until Aug. 20 to give a response to the allegations to the NCAA Committee on Infractions.
Head coach Jim Calhoun is listed in the notice for failing "to promote an atmosphere of compliance in the men's basketball program and a failure to adequately monitor the program to ensure compliance with NCAA legislation regarding telephone calls, text messages and benefits provided by a representative of the institution's athletic interests."
The most damning aspect of the report (to my eyes) is the allegation that two members of the basketball staff provided either false or misleading information to both the NCAA and the school. The two members of the staff aren't named, and I will not speculate about who they are, but again, two members of the basketball staff stepped down yesterday.
In addition, UConn itself is cited for "a failure by the institution to adequately monitor the conduct and administration of the men's basketball staff in the areas of: telephone records, representatives of the institution's athletics interests; and, complimentary admissions or discretionary tickets."
The allegations also include impermissible phone calls and benefits provided to recruits, and providing impermissible use of free tickets.
The press release indicates that UConn will not any further comment on the matter at this time, but they are holding a press conference right now, so we'll see what comes out today.
The full release is after the jump, and we'll have much more throughout the day.
STORRS, Conn. - The University of Connecticut announced Friday that it has received a notice of allegations from the NCAA pertaining to the men's basketball program.
This notice is the result of 15 months of review by the NCAA and the University in response to published reports in March of 2009 which alleged NCAA violations by current and former members of the UConn men's basketball staff.
This notice of allegations concludes the initial fact-finding portion of the NCAA review. The University has until August 20, 2010 to provide its response to the notice of allegations to the NCAA Committee on Infractions. During this period, the University will continue to review and collect information in regard to this case. University representatives are scheduled to appear before the committee in Indianapolis on October 15-16, 2010.
The notice contains eight allegations of violation of NCAA Bylaws including:
-Impermissible phone calls and text messages to prospective student-athletes;
-Impermissible benefits provided to a prospective student-athlete by a representative of the institution's athletic interests; -Impermissible benefit to a prospective student-athlete by a member of the basketball staff;
-Allegations against two (2) members of the basketball staff for providing false and misleading information to the NCAA Enforcement staff and to the institution;
-Providing impermissible complimentary admissions or discretionary tickets;
-A failure by the head men's basketball coach to promote an atmosphere of compliance in the men's basketball program and a failure to adequately monitor the program to ensure compliance with NCAA legislation regarding telephone calls, text messages and benefits provided by a representative of the institution's athletic interests;
-A failure by the institution to adequately monitor the conduct and administration of the men's basketball staff in the areas of: telephone records, representatives of the institution's athletics interests; and, complimentary admissions or discretionary tickets.
|
|
The University and Athletic Department will not be making any further comments as this is an ongoing process with the NCAA.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here comes the pain.
I’m expecting the NCAA bulldozer to be careening through Storrs any second now.
From David Borges and his anonymous source:
-30 impermissible phone calls out of 30,000
-Sellers caught in some “inconsistencies” in his NCAA interview
-Postseason ban isn’t likely
So…could be worse, then?
Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.
Serves me right for taking Borges' word, I guess
From the report:
-Archibald 114 impermissible phone calls & 181 texts (to [BLANKED OUT NAME]
-LaFleur 13 calls to three different prospective players
-Sellers 19 calls to four different prospective players
-Various impermissible telephone calls dating back to June 2005, October 2005,
-Calhoun himself made 1 impermissible call each in April and June of 2007
And that’s just the first count.
I am suddenly way, way, way less optimistic than I was 10 minutes.
Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.
by Kevin Meacham on May 28, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Hey, maybe this thread will be me just eventually descending into madness
From the second count, which is all about Nochimson:
-Alleges, apparently, many of the infractions in the original Yahoo Sports report
-Most damning, to me, the NCAA is requesting a copy of a letter from 1999, from then-associate AD Bill Shults in which the administrator writes to the men’s basketball coaching staff “describing Nochimson’s potential status as a sports agent and advising the staff of NCAA legislation to such status,” meaning they (or Calhoun, at least) WERE aware that talking to him was a no-no.
Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.
by Kevin Meacham on May 28, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
That doesn't strike me as damning so much
as it just seems like a way for the NCAA to have supporting evidence to say “you are morons, you should thank your lucky stars Miles never suited up, now take your slap on the wrist and go home.”
by Andrew Porter on May 28, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s hard to tell because of all the redactions, but if they’re drawing direct conclusions between
Staff → Nochimson the booster/agent → Miles
where the first arrow = “hours of contact via phone” and the second = “money and benefits”? That seems a little more serious.
And that’s not even touching on the report that Nochimson and Majok had contact….although I suppose we probably would’ve heard something more about that by now.
Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.
by Kevin Meacham on May 28, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Well Calhoun's statement said the NCAA was looking into the recruitment of a specific player
as in one, so I’ll take comfort in that.
I assume the money and benefits thing is the widely-reported surgery that Nochimson paid for for Miles, right?
by Andrew Porter on May 28, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions

by 









