The UConn Blog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Pros and Cons of an 18-game NFL Schedule

UConn Hockey: Enough Is Enough

I don't like the idea of sites set up to call for a coach's firing, or people saying they can do the job better themselves. But I'm writing this post because I am 100% certain I am correct on this one. It's painful to watch a program with decades of history going down the drain because the coach in charge looks like he doesn't care anymore.

No, I don't mean George Blaney.

Star-divide

I'm talking about Bruce Marshall. Who is Bruce Marshall? He is the winningest coach in the history of UConn Men's Ice Hockey. He led the team's NCAA-mandated jump from a middling Division III team to being the worst team in Division I.

I'm not being facetious. The University of Connecticut has the worst team in all of Division I. This year the team is 4-22-3.

4 wins. 3 ties. 22 losses.

But it would be silly to say they have the worst team in all of D-I based on schedule. After all, the Huskies play in Atlantic Hockey, which is the Great West of Division I hockey (complete with having Air Force in the conference, because when I'm thinking of the Atlantic Ocean, oh yeah, I'm thinking of Colorado Springs). As such, they are going to be playing against bigger, stronger schools (read: ones whose athletic departments care) out-of-conference.

They are the worst team based on statistics. Let me explain through the wonders of math.

UConn is 58th in the RPI. Out of 58. By a wide margin.

Despite playing an easier schedule than 6 other D-I teams.

Putting them behind American International College.

Which is an otherwise Division-III commuter school.

In Springfield.

 

The program has been trending downwards since the program's apex, winning the 2000 MAAC Hockey Championship at home, in front of a packed house. Unfortunately for the Huskies, the NCAA did not grant auto-bids to teams that won their conference tournaments until the next season. Little did anyone know that Bruce Marshall would oversee a program careening off the tracks after that.

Season W-L-T

2009-10 4-22-3

2008-09 9-26-2

2007-08 13-21-3

2006-07 16-18-2

2005-06 11-23-2

2004-05 11-23-3

2003-04 12-16-7

2002-03 8-23-3

2001-02 13-16-7

2000-01 12-19-4

TOTAL: Last 9+ seasons 109 wins, 207 losses, 36 ties

To be fair, this year's team is young. 18 underclassmen. No slight to these young men, they deserve a lot of credit for playing at UConn while getting no athletic scholarship assistance, despite all the past failures, just because they love the school and love their sport. They are the student-athlete pictures the NCAA tries to drill into us ad-nauseum during March, between games where one-and-dones make millions of dollars for their schools.

But the stats above don't lie. I don't expect it to get any better in the next 3 years because it hasn't gotten any better in the previous eight. Eight seasons, going on nine, is a perfectly reasonable time frame from which to conclude a change should be made.

Let Coach Marshall collect his pension, let him aid in the search, let him retire with dignity, name the rink surface for him if you'd like. But for the love of all that is Todd Krygier, make a change. Give some young assistant in Hockey East who wants a job a shot. Take a chance. Really, you can't improve on 4 wins? With a young impressionable roster? Impossible.

Long-term, I'm not expecting UConn to join Hockey East, even though their commissioner has in the past publicly opined for UConn and Rhode Island to step up and bring every state school in New England into the conference. I don't even expect a Quinnipiac-like-attention-whore push into the ECAC.

UConn has advantages over every single program in the conference. Every one. No military commitment, a bigtime athletic department committed to winning across the board, their own rink on-campus, a large school fan base to pull from and a very good academic school as well (love the LeMoyne synergy in that last link).

Can they try and at least be competitive in Atlantic Hockey? Is that really too much to ask?

If it is, then why bother. I love the program. Warts and all. But they should just drop it if they're going to let it rot. It's like leaving old tuna in your fridge because, well, you're too damn lazy to throw it out. You just get used to the smell because you tell yourself it'll change eventually.

It never does. It just smells worse.

1 recs  |  Comment 10 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

Nice take ZLS.

I admit, I know very little about UConn hockey, and though I may regularly mock BC fans for their devotion to the sport, I think its a shame that UConn (especially as a big school with a lot of resources in New England) does not have a bigger hockey program.

by Andrew Porter on Feb 9, 2010 6:27 AM EST reply actions  

Also, since everyone is still new at this SBNation thing

Here’s how the FanShot/FanPost thing works.

All commenters have access to our FanShot (for pic/link/video/quote sharing) and FanPost (for longer work like this post) features. You write them and it’ll go into our sidebar where anyone can read them/comment on them/etc. It basically allows you to discuss whatever you want with Meacham/Verrier/Me starting it all off.

If you bring us something interesting with your FanShot/FanPost, as ZLS did here, or Russell did with the Lorenzen video, we’ll bump your post into the main story stream on the front page so it will get a bit more attention and hopefully drive more discussion.

Of all the changes brought about by SBNation, this may be the one I’m most excited about, because it allows us to get a better community going and highlight your thoughts on anything/everything. Keep up the good work and thanks again for the Hockey insights ZLS.

by Andrew Porter on Feb 9, 2010 6:38 AM EST reply actions  

Without scholarships

I just don’t see how UConn can compete without scholarships. No reason UConn should be 4-22-3 (I’ve been tracking their epic race to avoid last place in the AHA with AIC all season), of course, and I don’t disagree with your fundamental point about Marshall, but it’s tough to draw serious Division I talent in any sport to pay their way and play.

In a perfect world, UConn’s men’s hockey team would be really good (Freitas is a cozy, nice place to watch a game) and UConn’s men’s lacrosse team would beat Syracuse in front of 8,000 people at old Memorial/new Morrone Stadium. Those are really the two blemishes on UConn’s otherwise-excellent athletic department.

Alas, Title IX remains in effect and unless UConn suddenly starts giving out scholarships for women’s crew, rugby and polo, those are just pipe dreams.

On the other hand, the women’s hockey team appears to be fairly nasty this year.

Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.

by Kevin Meacham on Feb 9, 2010 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

UConn has a mens Lax team? Get the fuck out of here! (our club team could whoop your club team)

Before this post, I didnt know UConn had hockey. If they want to be competitive they need to be fully funded.

by ryanwk628 on Feb 9, 2010 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Just a club lax team, unfortunately

You’d think UConn would be a perfect place to have a decent → good lacrosse team, since CT is a hotbed of sorts. My research tells me that our club team is half-decent in a league with BC, URI, UNH and other New England teams. But Title IX rules all, I suppose.

But yeah, you’re 100% right…the hockey program will be kind of a joke until they’re funded.

Orange Bowl/dual Final Fours or bust in 2011. We're going all-in.

by Kevin Meacham on Feb 9, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

your a loser!

Did you ever hear of not getting money for players to come to play at our school. Do you really think our basketball teams would be good if they didn’t get any money?? Are we going to fire everyone whos teams don’t get money. Maybe if you donated some money to the hockey program or spent as much time as you do raggin on the coach writing the AD for more money for the program we would get somewhere. I think you are the JOKE

by uconn on Mar 8, 2010 10:57 PM EST reply actions  

Coach Marshall

Coach Marahall is one of the most dedicated coaches that I have ever had the opportunety to meet and watch coach over the years. Not only is he a good coach he takes care of each of his players like they are his own. Not only on the ice but off. His attention to each players game and academics makes him more than just a good coach. It makes him a great coach. Maybe he isn’t having the most winning season he has ever had but isn’t it funny how quickly we forget the good times. As soon as things aren’t going as good as some fan wants them to go them get on a blog and demand that he be fired. It is just outragous. It takes more to coach a team than strickly on ice play and if things aren’t perfect I am sure demanding the coach be fired isn’t the way to go. have you ever heard of loyalty to your school and to the coaches and players who play for us in good times and in bad??

by uconn on Mar 8, 2010 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

This

This is why college athletics is such a slippery slope. I’ve heard this about Marshall from everyone that has ever been in contact with the guy. But still, five wins is five wins.

by fcmonk on Mar 11, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you

for putting that in the absolutely nicest way possible. I read this guy’s comments a couple days ago and wanted to rip into the him, but thought better of it.

Who’s to say that another coach wouldn’t care as much about his player or the community as much as Marshall. The point of college athletics is to win. Yes he has a responsibilty to make sure his players succeed academically, but there is some accountabilty on the coach to put a team on the ice that wins. Its not like this is one down season, the team hasn’t sniffed .500 for a couple of years.

No one is being disloyal to the school by saying a new coach is needed and that the team should not be the worst in the NCAA, even without scholarships.

by Fergy on Mar 13, 2010 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Big East sports blog that WON'T kidnap and kill you.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Utah wide receiver Jereme Brooks (85) celebrates a touchdown with teammates during the first half of an NCAA college football game against Pittsburgh on Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson)

No. 15 Pittsburgh Rallies In Fourth Quarter, But Loses To Utah In Overtime, 27-24

HONOLULU - SEPTEMBER 2:  Ronald Johnson #83 of the University of Southern California Trojans runs in for a touchdown against Corey Nielsen #8 of the University of Hawaii Warriors during first half action at Aloha Stadium September 2 2010 in Honolulu Hawaii. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

Lane Kiffin Is Victorious In Debut, No. 14 USC Wins In A Shootout At Hawaii, 49-36

South Carolina quarterback Stephen Garcia, left, celebrates a first-quarter touchdown with South Carolina tackle Kyle Nunn, center, and South Carolina guard Rokevious Watkins, right, during the first half of their NCAA college football game against Southern Mississippi, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, at Williams-Brice Stadium, in Columbia, S.C.  (AP Photo/Brett Flashnick) link

South Carolina Rolls Over Southern Miss, Wins 41-13

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Uclogo_small Andrew Porter

0607_uconn_mandeldove_jonathan_web_small UConnBlog Justin

Awesome_hasheem_small Kevin Meacham