Well, that was not memorable: UConn 76-Rutgers 58
To be entirely honest, I started composing this "recap" with about 10 minutes remaining in the second half today. As I'm writing this, UConn is leading 56-38, showing no signs of letting up and frankly, I'm bored.
UConn needed this game, and they got it, thats about as far as I can go for "analysis." Simply put, Rutgers is a horrible basketball team. In the first half, UConn was clearly the better team, though it could be tough to tell by how much. In the second half, of course, UConn came out with an explosive start and put the game away, outscoring Rutgers 27-13 in the first 12 minutes.
What has killed UConn this year is not so much the close losses, but rather the losses to teams that the Huskies should have beat (Marquette, Providence, Cincy x2). In that sense, this game is a marked improvement and a clear step in the right direction. Its nice to see the momentum carry over from the Villanova win, and hopefully that will continue into Monday when UConn takes on West Virginia.
There were a few nice bright spots: the team shot very well from beyond the arc, controlled the boards in the second half and Donnell Beverly added some nice production off the bench. However, not all was well. UConn (especially Dyson) is still turning the ball over far too much, and if they cannot control the ball better on Monday, they will lose (I should note that Kemba Walker did do well in this department, as he has in the last few games, lets hope he keeps this up).
In the end though, this was just UConn taking care of business. It was an 18-point win over a team that they should have beat by 18 points. It is nice to have the win, because without it UConn's slim tournament dreams might be done, but the real work still lies ahead.
Oh, and the stat of the night? Stanley Robinson scored in double-figures for the 33rd straight game. For someone we usually kill for being inconsistent, that is very, very impressive.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
But let's not forget, Rutgers beat Georgetown!
We should never, never let them forget that.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Feb 20, 2010 6:52 PM EST reply actions
Didn't watch the game
But just wanted to point out that Stanley’s problem was never that he couldn’t score in double figures; he just couldn’t score when the game was on the line.
This from a post midway through Big East season that I never got around to using because I think Cal went on the shelf:
“But late in the game, Stan has transformed back into his usual, translucent state. Over the past six games – more commonly known as the time UConn realized it wasn’t good – Stan has averaged an impressive 16.7 points. But in that same span, he has also scored just seven total points with under seven minutes left in the game. Over the final 12 minutes he’s averaging only 2.5 points, and over the final 15 minutes, he’s averaging only 3.8 points.”
by UConnBlog Justin on Feb 20, 2010 11:30 PM EST reply actions
True and 100 percent right.
I did not express myself well in the post — yes, Stanley disappears in the clutch. Always. What I was marveling at is the length of his streak. Tracing back, that means the last time he didn’t get to 10 points would have been mid-February of last year. However, if you had asked me before the game the last time Stanley scored less then 10 I probably would have thought he did it at least once (and probably more) in the last dozen games or so.
by Andrew Porter on Feb 21, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions
Word
Streak is still quite impressive. I wonder if it’s longer than Dyson’s?
by UConnBlog Justin on Feb 21, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions

by 










