The UConn Blog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

The NCAA does not understand the concept of "equilibrium"

Or at least, it seems that way, if the unconfirmed reports of NCAA Tournament expansion are to be believed.

The NCAA wants to expand to either 68 or 96 teams, depending on who you believe.

The 68-team bracket would expand the number of ultra-popular play-in games between teams you've never heard of from one to four; the 96-team bracket would create a whole new round for bracketologists to go crazy over.

The 68-team bracket isn't a terrible idea in theory, but only if you punish the last eight at-large teams by having them face off with each other. Wouldn't you much rather watch (say) Clemson vs. Minnesota for the right to take on a No. 5 seed Vanderbilt, rather than Alabama A&M-Chattanooga for the right to be destroyed by Kansas?

Of course, the NCAA geniuses will just match up the worst eight teams in the field, creating four more games that nobody will watch.

So this, to me, makes the 96-team bracket more likely. Let's do some quick math.

There are six major conferences (ACC, Big 10, Big 12, Big East, Pac 10, SEC) who suck up most of the at-large NCAA Tournament bids now. Those six conferences are made up of 73 teams at present. If you allow for a generous average of 2 bids for the other 25 leagues, at least 46 of those 73 teams (and this is about as low as it would feasibly go) are making the new-and-improved NCAA Tournament. That's roughly two-thirds of all the 'BCS' conference teams - or adding ~20 bubble teams to the tournament proper, and another 20 middling teams to the bubble.

Finish 7th in the Pac-10 (maybe not this year, anyway)? You're probably in. The 11th-place team in the Big East? Here's your bid to the national championship tournament. (I would laugh if the NIT, CBI and CollegeInsider.com tournaments all continued, sweeping up every .500 team in America.)

The tournament as constructed currently is perfection. The NCAA is going to tinker with it, even though the NCAA is a non-profit (ha!) governing body (ha!) that must balance academics (ha!) with athletics.

And yet they won't expand the NCAA Division I football playoffs from 0 teams to some reasonable non-zero number. I hate you, NCAA.

Poll
How do you like your NCAA Tournament?
Two teams, let computers decide
2 votes
Between 3 and 63 teams
0 votes
64 teams
8 votes
Between 65 and 68 teams; play-in games determine last at-large teams
5 votes
Between 65 and 68 teams; play-in games determine lambs for No. 1 seeds to slaughter
1 votes
96 teams
0 votes
Everybody gets in! Think of how cool a 340-team bracket would look.
3 votes

19 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 1 comment  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Dumb dumb dumb dumb

dumb.

What a horrible idea.

by Andrew Porter on Feb 1, 2010 5:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

The Big East sports blog that WON'T kidnap and kill you.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Senior Class: The Charges
Small
Bandwagon to Omaha
Uclogo_small
Anonymous opposing coach: UConn is 'the team you don't want to play in the Big East tournament'
Small
Fact: Teenage girls dislike Syracuse
Small
UConn Hockey: Enough Is Enough
Uconn_small
Inspired!
Small
I can't believe this hasn't been posted yet, Tyler Lorenzen singing 'Single Ladies'
Awesome_hasheem_small
UConn men pick up PG recruit, maybe (UPDATE: Nope.)
Awesome_hasheem_small
The NCAA does not understand the concept of "equilibrium"
Uconn_small
Frustrating!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclogo_small Andrew Porter

0607_uconn_mandeldove_jonathan_web_small UConnBlog Justin

Awesome_hasheem_small Kevin Meacham

Official Partner of CBS Sports