Well that is a relief: UConn-St. John's recap
Well, UConn finally won a game. It was not especially pretty, and it except for the circumstances surrounding it, it wasn't particularly notable, but it was a win. For the first time since the 2006-07 season, the Huskies had found themselves on a three game losing streak and thanks to pitiful St. John's, the streak will not be extended to four.
The big story of course is the fact that Jim Calhoun was not on the sidelines, though you would not know it from looking at the box score. UConn was led by the trio of Stanley Robinson, Jerome Dyson and Kemba Walker (who did turn in another nice performance, with only one turnover), and the rest of the squad pitched in a little along the way. The Huskies did enough to get the 75-59 win, and put together a solid second half (outscoring St. John's 44-31), and not much more.
To be frank, outside of George Blaney doing a nice job to keep order, I cannot think of much from the game worth talking about. UConn played fine, they beat a team they were supposed to beat and now they'll move on. It was nice to get a third Big East win, and I am starting to hope that Kemba has turned a corner, but I'm already passed all that. This was an unremarkable game on an unremarkable day in mid-January. The real questions still lie ahead: When will Jim Calhoun be back? And how will this team do against No. 1 Texas on Saturday?
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
whoa whoa whoa
So this is an easy win to downplay. But I think we’re underestimating St. Johns and underappreciating some remarkable things.
For one, St. John’s came in with a better record than us (12-5 v. 11-6). They’ve played weaker teams. But at the moment they have more wins over likely tournament teams than we do, with a win over Siena, who is 15-4/8-0 in conference and won in the tournament last year, and a win over Temple, who is currently 17th in the country. They also beat Cincinatti, which we couldn’t do. So, I think it’s wrong to call St John’s pitiful.
Second, I think it was pretty pretty, especially compared to how we’ve been playing. We shot 57%, held St John’s to 36%, made 6/14 threes, shot 11/12 on free throws, and had 9 players score. And Kemba looked Kembawesome. On an abstract analysis level, we played sluggish the first half, said to heck with that, and took over the game entirely in the second half. When was the last time that happened? I thought this game was a notable win, and I’m feeling a lot better about this team after having watched it.
In the short term, yes, a decent win
It stops the bleeding, Blane Dog did a good job pinch hitting, Kemba played a bit better, etc.
In the long term, not so much.
St. John’s isn’t a Tournament team, regardless of who they’ve beat. And although any moral victory is probably a welcomed sight right now, UConn has about fourish NBA players and they have none. (And the whole they beat Cincy, we lost to Cincy = they’re better doesnt’ really hold up, especially in the Big East.) Regardless of how low anyone has his or her expectations at this point, in the end, it’s just another win over a team we should have beat.
by UConnBlog Justin on Jan 21, 2010 12:05 PM EST reply actions
I'm with you 100 percent.
I feel like any satisfaction derived from last nights win is a measure of the artificially low expectations fans had going into it. The 3 game losing streak and losing Cal will make any win seem much better than it is.
by Andrew Porter on Jan 21, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
Sidenote
D-Bev played about 20 minutes in each of the past two games. He did not create a ton, but he kept the offense under control for the most part. I doubt we’ll see him this much against Texas, but its nice to see him getting some minutes. If nothing else, he could be a steadying hand that helps limit the pace when it gets too out of control.

by 











